[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250102141015.bc8ef069a91cfd9664538494@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 14:10:15 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Marco Nelissen <marco.nelissen@...il.com>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] filemap: avoid truncating 64-bit offset to 32 bits
On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 11:04:11 -0800 Marco Nelissen <marco.nelissen@...il.com> wrote:
> on 32-bit kernels, folio_seek_hole_data() was inadvertently truncating a
> 64-bit value to 32 bits, leading to a possible infinite loop when writing
> to an xfs filesystem.
>
> ...
>
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -3005,7 +3005,7 @@ static inline loff_t folio_seek_hole_data(struct xa_state *xas,
> if (ops->is_partially_uptodate(folio, offset, bsz) ==
> seek_data)
> break;
> - start = (start + bsz) & ~(bsz - 1);
> + start = (start + bsz) & ~((u64)bsz - 1);
> offset += bsz;
> } while (offset < folio_size(folio));
> unlock:
Thanks. I'll add
Fixes: 54fa39ac2e00b ("iomap: use mapping_seek_hole_data")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
The
offset = offset_in_folio(folio, start) & ~(bsz - 1);
a few lines earlier is worrisome. I wonder if we should simply make
`bsz' and `offset' have type u64 and sleep well at night.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists