[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<VI1PR09MB2333BC61D958FB3DA5B8039594112@VI1PR09MB2333.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 08:59:59 +0000
From: Vladimir Kondratiev <Vladimir.Kondratiev@...ileye.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Paul Walmsley
<paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou
<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add risc-v,aplic
hart indexes
>Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
>and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
>kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
>your patches on recent Linux kernel.
>Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
>people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
>ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
>(don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
>fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
>patches to the patchset.
>You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
>tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
>a waste of time.
>Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
></form letter>
>Best regards,
>Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof.
you're right, I missed devicetree@...r.kernel.org.
I do run scripts/get_maintainer.pl but indeed I missed this line.
I'll re-send adding it.
Question: can I re-send same "patch v3" or shall I increment
the version to "patch v4"?
Thanks, Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists