[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z30KZM1RGdFvB1dy@hu-varada-blr.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 16:35:08 +0530
From: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, <kw@...ux.com>,
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
<kishon@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <quic_nsekar@...cinc.com>,
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Document the IPQ5332 PCIe
controller
On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 08:45:14AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 05:00:17PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > Document the PCIe controller on IPQ5332 platform.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
> > ---
> > v5: Re-arrange 5332 and 9574 compatibles to handle fallback usage in dts
>
> What? How this is related to commit msg?
>
> >
> > v4: * v3 reused ipq9574 bindings for ipq5332. Instead add one for ipq5332
> > * DTS uses ipq9574 compatible as fallback. Hence move ipq9574 to be able
> > to use the 'reg' section for both ipq5332 and ipq9574. Else, dtbs_check
> > and dt_binding_check flag errors.
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml | 10 ++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
> > index bd87f6b49d68..9f37eca1ce0d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
> > @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ properties:
> > - qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2
> > - qcom,pcie-ipq8074
> > - qcom,pcie-ipq8074-gen3
> > - - qcom,pcie-ipq9574
>
> I don't understand this change at all and your commit msg explains
> here nothing.
All DT entries except "reg" is similar between ipq5332 and
ipq9574. ipq9574 has 5 registers while ipq5332 has 6. MHI is the
additional (i.e. sixth) entry for ipq5332.
If ipq9574 is not removed from here, dt_binding_check gives the
following errors
1. /local/mnt/workspace/varada/upstream/pci-v6/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp474.dtb: pcie@...00000: reg: [[557056, 12288], [402653184, 3869], [402657056, 168], [402657280, 4096], [403701760, 4096], [569344, 4096]] is too long
Failed validating 'maxItems' in schema['allOf'][2]['then']['properties']['reg']:
{'maxItems': 5, 'minItems': 5}
2. /local/mnt/workspace/varada/upstream/pci-v6/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp474.dtb: pcie@...00000: reg-names: ['parf', 'dbi', 'elbi', 'atu', 'config', 'mhi'] is too long
Failed validating 'maxItems' in schema['allOf'][2]['then']['properties']['reg-names']:
{'items': [{'const': 'dbi'},
{'const': 'elbi'},
{'const': 'atu'},
{'const': 'parf'},
{'const': 'config'}],
'maxItems': 5,
'minItems': 5,
'type': 'array'}
Hence had to remove it from here and add it to the sdx55 reg
definition.
Will capture this in the commit message.
Thanks
Varada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists