linux-kernel - Re: [External Email] Re: [PATCH v7] serial: sc16is7xx: Add polling mode if no IRQ pin is available

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025011757-unwrapped-evergreen-20a6@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:40:26 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Andre Werner <andre.werner@...tec-electronic.com>
Cc: jirislaby@...nel.org, hvilleneuve@...onoff.com, andy@...nel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, lech.perczak@...lingroup.com,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [External Email] Re: [PATCH v7] serial: sc16is7xx: Add polling
 mode if no IRQ pin is available

On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 01:37:54PM +0100, Andre Werner wrote:
> Dear Greg,
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 09:34:47AM +0100, Andre Werner wrote:
> > > Fall back to polling mode if no interrupt is configured because there
> > > is no possibility to connect the interrupt pin.
> > >
> > > If no interrupt pin is available the driver uses a delayed worker to
> > > poll the state of interrupt status registers (IIR).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andre Werner <andre.werner@...tec-electronic.com>
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250110073104.1029633-2-andre.werner@systec-electronic.com
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> >
> > This whole commit is already in my tree, why is it submitted again?
> 
> This is my fault. I misunderstood a comment from a reviewer.
> There is a patch that i still discussed in this thread:
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/1/16/398
> 
> Also the thread has a weird structure. Sorry!

Yes, please send a new version so that it can be considered to be
applied properly, I can't dig it out of that thread easily, could you if
you had to do it? :)

thanks,

greg k-h