[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA++9cvpBHN-i82mMwd_WZZrDGEQog2DmUSWcE9hDxsREyhNdrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 11:54:10 +0800
From: Langyan Ye <yelangyan@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: neil.armstrong@...aro.org, quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de,
airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com, sam@...nborg.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add compatible for
KD110N11-51IE and 2082109QFH040022-50E
Hi Doug,
Your suggestion is very helpful to me, thank you.
I confirmed the controller chips of these two panels, and it turned
out that they use the HX83102 IC, so the correct approach is that I
should add these two MIPI panels to the binding file/driver of the
MIPI controller of HX83102.I would like to ask if I need to release a
v5 version or resend a new email if I do this?
Thank you again for taking the time out of your busy schedule to guide me.
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> 于2025年1月24日周五 01:46写道:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:48 PM Langyan Ye
> <yelangyan@...qin.corp-partner.google.com> wrote:
> >
> > KINGDISPLAY KD110N11-51IE and STARRY 2082109QFH040022-50E are
> > 10.95-inch WUXGA TFT LCD panels, which fits in nicely with the
> > existing panel-boe-tv101wum-nl6 driver. Hence, we add a new
> > compatible with panel specific config.
>
> FWIW, this is still missing acting on a request that Krzysztof made.
> Specifically, instead of the above wordy patch description, he
> suggested a much simpler patch description that was just one sentence.
> I could believe his suggestion may be difficult to understand if your
> English isn't strong. He said [1]:
>
> > "Add a new compatible for foo bar panel ....". One sentence. Could be
> > also one patch, not two patches
>
> Putting that more concretely, you'd want to change your patch
> description in this case to:
>
> Add a new compatible for the panels KINGDISPLAY KD110N11-51IE and
> STARRY 2082109QFH040022-50E.
>
> ...and that's it.
>
> Personally I wouldn't send a V5 just for this, but if Krzysztof
> requests it strongly then I wouldn't object.
>
> That all being said, the part of the CL description that Krzysztof
> wants you to trim is actually somewhat relevant to me if I am to give
> a Reviewed-By tag. The agreement from DRM folks seemed to be that we
> don't want to jam all MIPI panels into one bindings file and one
> driver. The idea is that they should be organized by the controller
> chip. For some history here, see [2] and all of the discussion in
> response to a previous patch [3].
>
> So the question is: do the new panels you're adding actually share the
> same onboard MIPI controller as the other ones in this file? If not
> then you _do_ need to spin your patch. If there's already some other
> bindings file / driver for the MIPI controller in these panels then
> you can add to that. If not then you'd need to add a new bindings file
> and a new driver.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/9cf4efd5-cc4b-492c-a1f3-18a19ba7afeb@kernel.org
> [2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240516072039.1287065-3-yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240410071439.2152588-1-yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists