linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] gpio: max3191x: use gpiod_multi_set_value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <945b338c-8fe1-4082-a20f-57f8152e8f80@baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 09:23:11 -0600
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
 Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
 Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
 <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
 Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá
 <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] gpio: max3191x: use
 gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep

On 2/7/25 4:34 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 12:48 AM David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
>>
>> Reduce verbosity by using gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep() instead of
>> gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep().
> 
> It seems you missed my comment.

Yes, I must have been sleeping on the job. :-/

> 
>> +static void gpiod_set_array_single_value_cansleep(struct gpio_descs *descs,
>>                                                   int value)
> 
> This is not good namespacing. Can we change this while at it?

sure

> 
> max3191x_...
> 
> (I would go with max3191x_set_modesel_pins() to make it shorter. I
> have no clue why the function repeats so much from gpiod API naming.
> Is there anything else which is named in a similar way? Perhaps fix it
> by a separate patch?)
>