[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42e8f0e0f065b10fa8731d26acc856e5776fe2de.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:08:03 +0100
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>, Paul Walmsley
<paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou
<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Uwe
Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sophgo@...ts.linux.dev, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Yixun Lan
<dlan@...too.org>, Longbin Li <looong.bin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] reset: introduct generic bit reset controller
On Do, 2025-02-13 at 10:08 +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> Many SoC have a simple reset controller with toggling bit to perform
> assert/deassert. It is annoyed to add compatiable for each device when
> coming a new SoC. It is necessary to introduct a generic device to
> simplify these things.
You'll still have to add a compatible to reset-simple.yaml for each new
SoC, see patch 3.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists