[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c94580f0-3ab0-4a19-a996-9bb37e23dd39@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:01:41 +0200
From: Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@...il.com>
To: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Julien Massot <julien.massot@...labora.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>, Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Umang Jain <umang.jain@...asonboard.com>, Paweł Anikiel
<panikiel@...gle.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] media: add v4l2_subdev_state_xlate_streams()
On 2/20/25 1:38 PM, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> Hi Cosmin
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 11:20:32AM +0200, Cosmin Tanislav wrote:
>> Currently, the v4l2_subdev_state_xlate_streams() function is used
>> to translate streams from one pad to another.
>> This function takes the entire subdev state as argument, but only makes
>> use of the routing.
>
> Correct, but is this a problem ?
>
No, it's not a problem.
> Is this the first step for a larger rework or is this a drive-by
> beautification ?
>
Mostly a drive-by beautification to avoid passing the whole state around
where we only need the routing. I'm planning to submit drivers for more
GMSL2/3 chips and we're using this just to not pass the whole state
around. I think I can just use v4l2_subdev_state_xlate_streams(),
but I had these patches in my tree and it would have been good to get
them upstream, in preparations for submitting the GMSL2/3 drivers.
> I'm asking because (and I know it's hard to strike a balance) this
> kind of changes tend to make back-porting a more painful, and if
> only justified by "it looks better" I would be a bit hesitant in
> taking them.
>
>
>>
>> Introduce a v4l2_subdev_routing_xlate_streams() function which can be
>> used without the entire subdev state, to avoid passing the entire state
>> around when not needed.
>>
>> Convert all usages of v4l2_subdev_state_xlate_streams() to
>> v4l2_subdev_routing_xlate_streams().
>>
>> Remove v4l2_subdev_state_xlate_streams().
>>
>> V2:
>> * Fix description of parameters
>>
>> Cosmin Tanislav (3):
>> media: v4l: subdev: add v4l2_subdev_routing_xlate_streams()
>> media: use v4l2_subdev_routing_xlate_streams()
>> media: v4l: subdev: remove v4l2_subdev_state_xlate_streams()
>>
>> drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub913.c | 14 ++++++-----
>> drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub953.c | 14 ++++++-----
>> drivers/media/i2c/max96714.c | 16 ++++++-------
>> drivers/media/i2c/max96717.c | 23 ++++++++++---------
>> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu6/ipu6-isys-csi2.c | 14 ++++++-----
>> .../platform/nxp/imx8-isi/imx8-isi-crossbar.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c | 7 +++---
>> include/media/v4l2-subdev.h | 10 ++++----
>> 8 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.48.1
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists