[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9guHSE0nwC1-52J@bogus>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:13:49 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] regulator: dummy: convert to use the faux device
interface
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 02:00:04PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 10:13:21AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>
> Why are you resending my patch back to me?
>
> > The dummy regulator driver does not need to create a platform device, it
> > only did so because it was simple to do. Change it over to use the
> > faux bus instead as this is NOT a real platform device, and it makes
> > the code even smaller than before.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Message-Id: <2025021027-outclass-stress-59dd@...gkh>
> > (sudeep.holla: Made dummy_regulator_driver static)
>
> So this is a new version?
>
Not really, I pulled your patch as I needed that as well to clean out
all faux device out of platform. I just made dummy_regulator_driver
static back again as compiler was warning. Definitely nothing new.
I will drop it when posting v2. You can probably fix up to make
dummy_regulator_driver static.
> And as was pointed out, this is already in my tree, and there's a
> conflict in linux-next with it.
>
Ah may be I missed to pull the updated next. I see I was still on
next-20250311. Sorry for that.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists