[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250321110010.95217-6-enjuk@amazon.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 19:59:02 +0900
From: Kohei Enju <enjuk@...zon.com>
To: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann
<daniel@...earbox.net>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, "Andrii
Nakryiko" <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong
Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav
Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa
<jolsa@...nel.org>, Peilin Ye <yepeilin@...gle.com>, Ilya Leoshkevich
<iii@...ux.ibm.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
<kohei.enju@...il.com>, Kohei Enju <enjuk@...zon.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for load-acquire/store-release when register number is invalid
syzbot reported out-of-bounds read in check_atomic_load/store() when
the register number is MAX_BPF_REG or greater in this context:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a5964227adc0f904549c
To avoid the issue from now on, let's add tests where the register
number is invalid for load-acquire/store-release.
By the way, I chose R11 as an invalid register but there's no particular
insistence on this choice as long as the register number is invalid.
Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <enjuk@...zon.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_load_acquire.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_store_release.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_load_acquire.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_load_acquire.c
index 1babe9ad9b43..e3912d2c6f95 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_load_acquire.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_load_acquire.c
@@ -189,6 +189,20 @@ __naked void load_acquire_from_sock_pointer(void)
: __clobber_all);
}
+SEC("socket")
+__description("load-acquire with invalid register R11")
+__failure __failure_unpriv __msg("R11 is invalid")
+__naked void load_acquire_with_invalid_reg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ ".8byte %[load_acquire_insn];" // r0 = load_acquire((u64 *)(r11 + 0));
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_insn(load_acquire_insn,
+ BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_LOAD_ACQ, BPF_REG_0, 11 /* invalid reg */, 0))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
#else /* CAN_USE_LOAD_ACQ_STORE_REL */
SEC("socket")
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_store_release.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_store_release.c
index cd6f1e5f378b..2dc1d713b4a6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_store_release.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_store_release.c
@@ -257,6 +257,20 @@ __naked void store_release_leak_pointer_to_map(void)
: __clobber_all);
}
+SEC("socket")
+__description("store-release with invalid register R11")
+__failure __failure_unpriv __msg("R11 is invalid")
+__naked void store_release_with_invalid_reg(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ ".8byte %[store_release_insn];" // store_release((u64 *)(r11 + 0), r1);
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm_insn(store_release_insn,
+ BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_STORE_REL, 11 /* invalid reg */, BPF_REG_1, 0))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
#else
SEC("socket")
--
2.48.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists