linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] vfs misc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjNojYGmik93aB5UG1Nd5h2VHcVhKfBoYu9jVv_zh6Zng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 09:20:22 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] vfs misc

On Sat, 22 Mar 2025 at 03:13, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Merge conflicts with mainline
> =============================
>
> This contains a minor merge conflict for include/linux/fs.h.

Hmm. My resolution here was to just take the plain VFS_WARN_ON_INODE()
side, which basically drops commit 37d11cfc6360 ("vfs: sanity check
the length passed to inode_set_cached_link()") entirely, because that
one had a "TODO" that implies it's now replaced by the new
VFS_WARN_ON_INODE() interface.

This is just a note to make sure that if anybody was expecting
something else, you can now speak up and say "can you please do X".

Or, better yet, send a patch.

                Linus