[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d8d0d479a1ff19bc3e3a8f5832d924ab822f13a.camel@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 10:50:19 +0100
From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, Chanwoo
Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Alexandre
Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Peter Griffin
<peter.griffin@...aro.org>, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, Will
McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/32] dt-bindings: mfd: samsung,s2mps11: add s2mpg10
Hi Krzysztof,
On Mon, 2025-03-31 at 09:34 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 01:28:47PM +0000, André Draszik wrote:
> > allOf:
> > + - if:
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + contains:
> > + const: samsung,s2mpg10-pmic
> > + then:
> > + properties:
> > + reg: false
> > + samsung,s2mps11-acokb-ground: false
> > + samsung,s2mps11-wrstbi-ground: false
> > +
> > + oneOf:
> > + - required: [interrupts]
> > + - required: [interrupts-extended]
>
> Drop, you should require only interrupts.
As mentioned in the commit message comments, it doesn't work with
just interrupts. It appears that dtschema's fixups.py doesn't
handle this case. With just interrupts, DT validation will fail
if the DT uses interrupts-extended. There was at least one other
binding that specified interrupts in the same way, so I went with
the same approach.
> OTOH, why regulators subnode is not needed? Commit msg mentions they
> exist, so they should be required. Binding does not change because you
> added or did not add yet some driver support.
I wanted to avoid DT validation errors, because we haven't started
working on regulators yet, and it might take a little while until
everything is in place.
I'll make it required in the next version.
Thanks!
Andre'
Powered by blists - more mailing lists