[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <413657ae-8271-4a5a-9507-e9161d1f08c2@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 12:38:33 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mingzhe Yang <mingzhe.yang@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/rmap: add CONFIG_MM_ID guard for
folio_test_large_maybe_mapped_shared()
On 18.04.25 09:26, Lance Yang wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to review!
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 6:02 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 20:49:08 +0800 Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Add a compile-time check to make sure folio_test_large_maybe_mapped_shared()
>>> is only used with CONFIG_MM_ID enabled, as it directly accesses the _mm_ids
>>> field that only works under CONFIG_MM_ID.
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
>>> @@ -1232,6 +1232,8 @@ static inline int folio_has_private(const struct folio *folio)
>>>
>>> static inline bool folio_test_large_maybe_mapped_shared(const struct folio *folio)
>>> {
>>> + /* This function should never be called without CONFIG_MM_ID enabled. */
>>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MM_ID));
>>> return test_bit(FOLIO_MM_IDS_SHARED_BITNUM, &folio->_mm_ids);
>>> }
>>> #undef PF_ANY
>>
>> I don't get it. Sounds like we're adding a compile-time check to check
>> for a compilation error which would have happened anyway.
>>
>> If folio_test_large_maybe_mapped_shared() is only used with
>> CONFIG_MM_ID enabled, then do
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_MM_ID
>> static inline bool folio_test_large_maybe_mapped_shared(...)
>> {
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> ?
>
> Hmm... we considered using '#ifdef CONFIG_MM_ID' for
> folio_test_large_maybe_mapped_shared(),
> but since this function should never be called without CONFIG_MM_ID
> enabled, compile-time errors might be the way to go -- and a compile-time
> check here does the trick ;)
Yeah, I deliberately used plenty of IS_ENABLED to avoid a #ifdef mess
all over the place.
Maybe clarify in the patch description that we want to prevent the
function from getting used without CONFIG_MM_ID, and we don't want to
use #ifdef because then we'd have to add even more #ifdef in callers
that use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MM_ID).
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists