[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAkXwHNWPvb_wayc@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 19:39:28 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>
Cc: Kent Gustavsson <kent@...oris.se>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kent Gustavsson <nedo80@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Lukas Rauber <lukas.rauber@...itza.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio: adc: mcp3911: add reset management
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 04:46:51PM +0200, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> Add support for optional HW reset.
> If specified, a reset will be asserted during driver probe.
...
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(gpio_reset),
> + "Cannot get reset GPIO\n");
+ dev_printk.h
...
> + dev_dbg(dev, "gpio reset de-asserted.\n");
How useful is this?
...
> + /* Settling time after Hard Reset Mode (determined experimentally):
> + * 330 micro-seconds are too few; 470 micro-seconds are sufficient.
> + * Just in case, we add some safety factor... */
/*
* Please, fix the nulti-line comment
* style. This one can serve you as an
* example.
*/
> + fsleep(680);
Why not simply 500? or 600?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists