lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c7cdc09-272f-4226-851c-dfc50777f2dc@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 20:38:08 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, shangsong2@...ovo.com,
 Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] iommu: Allow attaching static domains in
 iommu_attach_device_pasid()

On 2025-04-23 3:18 am, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The idxd driver attaches the default domain to a PASID of the device to
> perform kernel DMA using that PASID. The domain is attached to the
> device's PASID through iommu_attach_device_pasid(), which checks if the
> domain->owner matches the iommu_ops retrieved from the device. If they
> do not match, it returns a failure.
> 
>          if (ops != domain->owner || pasid == IOMMU_NO_PASID)
>                  return -EINVAL;
> 
> The static identity domain implemented by the intel iommu driver doesn't
> specify the domain owner. Therefore, kernel DMA with PASID doesn't work
> for the idxd driver if the device translation mode is set to passthrough.
> 
> Generally the owner field of static domains are not set because they are
> already part of iommu ops. Add a helper domain_iommu_ops_compatible()
> that checks if a domain is compatible with the device's iommu ops. This
> helper explicitly allows the static blocked and identity domains associated
> with the device's iommu_ops to be considered compatible.

With the other domain->owner checks also wrapped as Jason pointed out 
(since it would be weird but not impossible for static domains to get 
into those paths as well),

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>

> Fixes: 2031c469f816 ("iommu/vt-d: Add support for static identity domain")
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220031
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20250422191554.GC1213339@ziepe.ca/
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Change log:
> -v2:
>   - Make the solution generic for all static domains as suggested by
>     Jason.
> -v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20250422075422.2084548-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com/
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 4f91a740c15f..abda40ec377a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -3402,6 +3402,19 @@ static void __iommu_remove_group_pasid(struct iommu_group *group,
>   		iommu_remove_dev_pasid(device->dev, pasid, domain);
>   }
>   
> +static bool domain_iommu_ops_compatible(const struct iommu_ops *ops,
> +					struct iommu_domain *domain)
> +{
> +	if (domain->owner == ops)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	/* For static domains, owner isn't set. */
> +	if (domain == ops->blocked_domain || domain == ops->identity_domain)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * iommu_attach_device_pasid() - Attach a domain to pasid of device
>    * @domain: the iommu domain.
> @@ -3435,7 +3448,8 @@ int iommu_attach_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>   	    !ops->blocked_domain->ops->set_dev_pasid)
>   		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>   
> -	if (ops != domain->owner || pasid == IOMMU_NO_PASID)
> +	if (!domain_iommu_ops_compatible(ops, domain) ||
> +	    pasid == IOMMU_NO_PASID)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&group->mutex);


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ