[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG-FcCNwOUQc2gRB83Opf47K0HdbHdw1aCo+aQEBQ5FVqrixAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 11:39:10 -0700
From: Ziwei Xiao <ziweixiao@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, jeroendb@...gle.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, willemb@...gle.com, pkaligineedi@...gle.com,
yyd@...gle.com, joshwash@...gle.com, shailend@...gle.com, linux@...blig.org,
thostet@...gle.com, jfraker@...gle.com, horms@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] gve: Add Rx HW timestamping support
Thanks Vadim and Jakub for the suggestions. Will send the timestamp
patch series with PTP device together.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 3:56 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 22:06:22 +0100 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> > It looks like it's better to have PTP device ready first
>
> Agreed. Or perhaps it will all fit in one series?
> --
> pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists