linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] counter: stm32-timer-cnt: add support for stm32mp25

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aCUyQbDj6pDdRYuL@ishi>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 09:16:01 +0900
From: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@...nel.org>
To: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, lee@...nel.org,
	robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
	olivier.moysan@...s.st.com, ukleinek@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] counter: stm32-timer-cnt: add support for
 stm32mp25

On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 11:30:14AM +0200, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> On 1/10/25 10:19, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> > Add support for STM32MP25 SoC. There are new counter modes that may be
> > implemented in later. Still, use newly introduced compatible to handle
> > this new HW variant and avoid being blocked with existing compatible
> > in SoC dtsi file. Modes supported currently still remains compatible.
> > New timer 20 has encoder capability, add it to the list.
> >
> > Acked-by: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/counter/stm32-timer-cnt.c | 7 +++++--
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The first patches of this series have been merged.
> 
> I'm not sure who shall pick this one ? (I think there's no dependency).
> Or do I need to resend it separately ?
> 
> Please advise,
> BR,
> Fabrice

I don't know if anyone has already picked up this patch, but I'll take
it through the counter tree regardless. No need to resend.

Thanks,

William Breathitt Gray

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)