[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR11MB5866E19DD8B4B386B87C5416E59EA@SJ0PR11MB5866.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 05:15:56 +0000
From: "Loktionov, Aleksandr" <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com"
<edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "skalluru@...vell.com"
<skalluru@...vell.com>, "manishc@...vell.com" <manishc@...vell.com>,
"andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "michael.chan@...adcom.com"
<michael.chan@...adcom.com>, "pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com"
<pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com>, "ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com"
<ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com>, "sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com"
<sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com>, "somnath.kotur@...adcom.com"
<somnath.kotur@...adcom.com>, "Nguyen, Anthony L"
<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "Kitszel, Przemyslaw"
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, "tariqt@...dia.com" <tariqt@...dia.com>,
"saeedm@...dia.com" <saeedm@...dia.com>, "louis.peens@...igine.com"
<louis.peens@...igine.com>, "shshaikh@...vell.com" <shshaikh@...vell.com>,
"GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com" <GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com>,
"ecree.xilinx@...il.com" <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, "horms@...nel.org"
<horms@...nel.org>, "dsahern@...nel.org" <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"ruanjinjie@...wei.com" <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, "mheib@...hat.com"
<mheib@...hat.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, "oss-drivers@...igine.com"
<oss-drivers@...igine.com>, "linux-net-drivers@....com"
<linux-net-drivers@....com>, "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 3/3] Revert "bnxt_en: bring
back rtnl_lock() in the bnxt_open() path"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org> On Behalf
> Of Stanislav Fomichev
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 10:36 PM
> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com; kuba@...nel.org;
> pabeni@...hat.com; skalluru@...vell.com; manishc@...vell.com;
> andrew+netdev@...n.ch; michael.chan@...adcom.com;
> pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com; ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com;
> sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com; somnath.kotur@...adcom.com;
> Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw
> <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>; tariqt@...dia.com; saeedm@...dia.com;
> louis.peens@...igine.com; shshaikh@...vell.com; GR-Linux-NIC-
> Dev@...vell.com; ecree.xilinx@...il.com; horms@...nel.org;
> dsahern@...nel.org; ruanjinjie@...wei.com; mheib@...hat.com;
> stfomichev@...il.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; intel-wired-
> lan@...ts.osuosl.org; linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org; oss-
> drivers@...igine.com; linux-net-drivers@....com; leon@...nel.org
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 3/3] Revert "bnxt_en: bring
> back rtnl_lock() in the bnxt_open() path"
>
> This reverts commit 325eb217e41fa14f307c7cc702bd18d0bb38fe84.
>
> udp_tunnel infra doesn't need RTNL, should be safe to get back to only
> netdev instance lock.
>
> Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 36 +++++-----------------
> -
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> index a3dadde65b8d..1da208c36572 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> @@ -14055,28 +14055,13 @@ static void bnxt_unlock_sp(struct bnxt *bp)
> netdev_unlock(bp->dev);
> }
>
> -/* Same as bnxt_lock_sp() with additional rtnl_lock */ -static void
> bnxt_rtnl_lock_sp(struct bnxt *bp) -{
> - clear_bit(BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK, &bp->state);
> - rtnl_lock();
> - netdev_lock(bp->dev);
> -}
> -
> -static void bnxt_rtnl_unlock_sp(struct bnxt *bp) -{
> - set_bit(BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK, &bp->state);
> - netdev_unlock(bp->dev);
> - rtnl_unlock();
> -}
> -
> /* Only called from bnxt_sp_task() */
> static void bnxt_reset(struct bnxt *bp, bool silent) {
> - bnxt_rtnl_lock_sp(bp);
> + bnxt_lock_sp(bp);
> if (test_bit(BNXT_STATE_OPEN, &bp->state))
> bnxt_reset_task(bp, silent);
> - bnxt_rtnl_unlock_sp(bp);
> + bnxt_unlock_sp(bp);
> }
>
> /* Only called from bnxt_sp_task() */
> @@ -14084,9 +14069,9 @@ static void bnxt_rx_ring_reset(struct bnxt
> *bp) {
> int i;
>
> - bnxt_rtnl_lock_sp(bp);
> + bnxt_lock_sp(bp);
> if (!test_bit(BNXT_STATE_OPEN, &bp->state)) {
> - bnxt_rtnl_unlock_sp(bp);
> + bnxt_unlock_sp(bp);
> return;
> }
> /* Disable and flush TPA before resetting the RX ring */ @@ -
> 14125,7 +14110,7 @@ static void bnxt_rx_ring_reset(struct bnxt *bp)
> }
> if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_TPA)
> bnxt_set_tpa(bp, true);
> - bnxt_rtnl_unlock_sp(bp);
> + bnxt_unlock_sp(bp);
> }
>
> static void bnxt_fw_fatal_close(struct bnxt *bp) @@ -15017,17
> +15002,15 @@ static void bnxt_fw_reset_task(struct work_struct *work)
> bp->fw_reset_state = BNXT_FW_RESET_STATE_OPENING;
> fallthrough;
> case BNXT_FW_RESET_STATE_OPENING:
> - while (!rtnl_trylock()) {
> + while (!netdev_trylock(bp->dev)) {
> bnxt_queue_fw_reset_work(bp, HZ / 10);
> return;
> }
> - netdev_lock(bp->dev);
> rc = bnxt_open(bp->dev);
> if (rc) {
> netdev_err(bp->dev, "bnxt_open() failed during FW
> reset\n");
> bnxt_fw_reset_abort(bp, rc);
> netdev_unlock(bp->dev);
> - rtnl_unlock();
> goto ulp_start;
> }
>
> @@ -15047,7 +15030,6 @@ static void bnxt_fw_reset_task(struct
> work_struct *work)
> bnxt_dl_health_fw_status_update(bp, true);
> }
> netdev_unlock(bp->dev);
> - rtnl_unlock();
> bnxt_ulp_start(bp, 0);
> bnxt_reenable_sriov(bp);
> netdev_lock(bp->dev);
> @@ -15996,7 +15978,7 @@ static int bnxt_queue_start(struct net_device
> *dev, void *qmem, int idx)
> rc);
> napi_enable_locked(&bnapi->napi);
> bnxt_db_nq_arm(bp, &cpr->cp_db, cpr->cp_raw_cons);
> - netif_close(dev);
> + bnxt_reset_task(bp, true);
> return rc;
> }
>
> @@ -16812,7 +16794,6 @@ static int bnxt_resume(struct device *device)
> struct bnxt *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
> int rc = 0;
>
> - rtnl_lock();
> netdev_lock(dev);
> rc = pci_enable_device(bp->pdev);
> if (rc) {
> @@ -16857,7 +16838,6 @@ static int bnxt_resume(struct device *device)
>
> resume_exit:
> netdev_unlock(bp->dev);
> - rtnl_unlock();
> bnxt_ulp_start(bp, rc);
> if (!rc)
> bnxt_reenable_sriov(bp);
> @@ -17023,7 +17003,6 @@ static void bnxt_io_resume(struct pci_dev
> *pdev)
> int err;
>
> netdev_info(bp->dev, "PCI Slot Resume\n");
> - rtnl_lock();
> netdev_lock(netdev);
>
> err = bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(bp);
> @@ -17041,7 +17020,6 @@ static void bnxt_io_resume(struct pci_dev
> *pdev)
> netif_device_attach(netdev);
>
> netdev_unlock(netdev);
> - rtnl_unlock();
> bnxt_ulp_start(bp, err);
> if (!err)
> bnxt_reenable_sriov(bp);
> --
> 2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists