[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250523164914.GO39944@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 18:49:14 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, rafael@...nel.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org, surenb@...gle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Make clangd usable
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 06:43:48PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Due to the weird Makefile setup of sched the various files do not
> compile as stand alone units. The new generation of editors are trying
> to do just this -- mostly to offer fancy things like completions but
> also better syntax highlighting and code navigation.
To be fair, by far the biggest help has turned out to be to get instant
compiler warning/fails while you type code. This has drastically reduced
the stupid typo, doesn't compile, try again cycle.
Code completion is 'cute' but I'm not really limited in typing speed,
getting pop-up function arguments while typing is useful.
The better code navigation is also very useful.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists