| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20250523140935.556fdede@gandalf.local.home> Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 14:09:35 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, rafael@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, paulmck@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org, surenb@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Make clangd usable On Fri, 23 May 2025 18:49:14 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 06:43:48PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > Due to the weird Makefile setup of sched the various files do not > > compile as stand alone units. The new generation of editors are trying > > to do just this -- mostly to offer fancy things like completions but > > also better syntax highlighting and code navigation. > > To be fair, by far the biggest help has turned out to be to get instant > compiler warning/fails while you type code. This has drastically reduced > the stupid typo, doesn't compile, try again cycle. > > Code completion is 'cute' but I'm not really limited in typing speed, > getting pop-up function arguments while typing is useful. > > The better code navigation is also very useful. Is there an emacs extension? (I'm sure there is, I'm just too lazy to look ;-) -- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists