[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df01d028-cf41-49be-8f70-b512f57c5cc6@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 15:01:52 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+0335df380edd9bd3ff70@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [usb?] WARNING in dtv5100_i2c_msg/usb_submit_urb
On 27.05.25 04:02, syzbot wrote:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> usb 1-1: BOGUS control dir, pipe 80000280 doesn't match bRequestType c0
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5833 at drivers/usb/core/urb.c:413 usb_submit_urb+0x1112/0x1870 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:411
[..]
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> usb_start_wait_urb+0x114/0x4c0 drivers/usb/core/message.c:59
> usb_internal_control_msg drivers/usb/core/message.c:103 [inline]
> usb_control_msg+0x232/0x3e0 drivers/usb/core/message.c:154
> dtv5100_i2c_msg+0x250/0x330 drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dtv5100.c:60
> dtv5100_i2c_xfer+0x1a4/0x3c0 drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/dtv5100.c:86
Hi,
these transfers are done via control transfers to endpoint 0.
So this is not yet another one of those cases that a driver fails
to verify that it operates on the intended hardware.
I'd say that a driver can assume that endpoint 0 exists and is
a control endpoint.
But I am afraid we never check that. Should we?
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists