linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] i2c: amd-isp: Initialize unique adpater name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eb2cdc21-0744-4ac7-96a7-bc84625a5644@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 23:15:29 -0400
From: "Nirujogi, Pratap" <pnirujog@....com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
 Pratap Nirujogi <pratap.nirujogi@....com>
Cc: rdunlap@...radead.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
 sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
 platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 benjamin.chan@....com, bin.du@....com, gjorgji.rosikopulos@....com,
 king.li@....com, dantony@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] i2c: amd-isp: Initialize unique adpater name

Hi Ilpo,

Thanks for the review feedback and guidance. Sure, I will take care of 
addressing the review comments and will ensure to include the key 
stakeholders / mailing lists recommened by scripts/get_maintainer.pl 
while submitting the next patch.

Thanks,
Pratap

On 5/31/2025 1:06 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
> 
> 
> Hi Pratap,
> 
> Please send the next version(s) to all relevant people as indicated by
> scripts/get_maintainer.pl.
> 
> On Fri, 30 May 2025, Pratap Nirujogi wrote:
> 
>> Initialize unique name for amdisp i2c adapter, which is used
>> in the platform driver to detect the matching adapter for
>> i2c_client creation.
>>
>> Fixes: 90b85567e457 ("platform/x86: Add AMD ISP platform config for OV05C10")
>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/04577a46-9add-420c-b181-29bad582026d@infradead.org
>> Signed-off-by: Pratap Nirujogi <pratap.nirujogi@....com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdisp.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdisp.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdisp.c
>> index ad6f08338124..e8cb3785c740 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdisp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdisp.c
>> @@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ static int amd_isp_dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>>        adap = &isp_i2c_dev->adapter;
>>        adap->owner = THIS_MODULE;
>> +     snprintf(adap->name, sizeof(adap->name),
>> +              "AMDISP DesignWare I2C adapter");
> 
> scnprintf() is preferrable over snprintf(). Even if you don't use the
> return value here, eventually somebody will want to get rid of snprintf()
> entirely so lets try not add new ones.
> 
sure, will use scnprintf() in place of snprintf() in v2.

>>        ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&adap->dev, ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev));
>>        adap->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>        /* use dynamically allocated adapter id */
>>
> 
> --
>   i.
>