[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250610-arm64-gcs-vfork-exit-v2-0-929443dfcf82@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 13:29:43 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] kselftest/arm64: Add coverage for the interaction
of vfork() and GCS
I had cause to look at the vfork() support for GCS and realised that we
don't have any direct test coverage, this series does so by adding
vfork() to nolibc and then using that in basic-gcs to provide some
simple vfork() coverage.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Add replacement of ifdef with if defined() in nolibc since the code
doesn't reflect the coding style.
- Remove check for arch specific vfork().
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250609-arm64-gcs-vfork-exit-v1-0-baad0f085747@kernel.org
---
Mark Brown (4):
tools/nolibc: Replace ifdef with if defined() in sys.h
tools/nolibc: Provide vfork()
kselftest/arm64: Add a test for vfork() with GCS
selftests/nolibc: Add coverage of vfork()
tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 57 +++++++++++++++++-------
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/gcs/basic-gcs.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 23 ++++++++--
3 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 19272b37aa4f83ca52bdf9c16d5d81bdd1354494
change-id: 20250528-arm64-gcs-vfork-exit-4a7daf7652ee
Best regards,
--
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists