[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250617115138.101795-1-p.raghav@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 13:51:38 +0200
From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...kajraghav.com,
Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs/buffer: fix comments to reflect logical block size
Commit e1defc4ff0cf ("block: Do away with the notion of hardsect_size")
changed hardsect_size to logical block size. The comment on top still
says hardsect_size.
Change it to logical block size to reflect the actual code.
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
---
fs/buffer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 8cf4a1dc481e..e818125d5c09 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -1122,7 +1122,7 @@ __getblk_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
{
bool blocking = gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp);
- /* Size must be multiple of hard sectorsize */
+ /* Size must be multiple of logical block size */
if (unlikely(size & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)-1) ||
(size < 512 || size > PAGE_SIZE))) {
printk(KERN_ERR "getblk(): invalid block size %d requested\n",
base-commit: e04c78d86a9699d136910cfc0bdcf01087e3267e
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists