[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <419d4155-af68-4264-81df-f882c481534f@suswa.mountain>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 19:54:36 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Fix error pointer vs NULL in
__mock_request_alloc()
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 11:01:08AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 12:04:49PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
> > @@ -290,7 +290,12 @@ struct smoketest {
> > static struct i915_request *
> > __mock_request_alloc(struct intel_context *ce)
> > {
> > - return mock_request(ce, 0);
> > + struct i915_request *rq;
> > +
> > + rq = mock_request(ce, 0);
> > + if (!rq)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> I believe we should fix mock_request and make it to stop replacing the
> error per NULL, and make the callers to check for IS_ERR instead of is not NULL.
>
> Then don't need to make up an error here.
>
Sure, can do.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists