[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aFW9l7JJnkB_ovsM@hyeyoo>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 04:59:19 +0900
From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
To: David Wang <00107082@....com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, urezki@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev,
surenb@...gle.com, kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/test_vmalloc.c: demote vmalloc_test_init to
late_initcall
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 10:24:48PM +0800, David Wang wrote:
> Commit 2d76e79315e4 ("lib/test_vmalloc.c: allow built-in execution")
> enable test_vmalloc module to be built into kernel directly, but
> vmalloc_test_init depends on alloc_tag module via alloc_tag_top_users().
>
> When a kernel build with following config:
>
> CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC=y
> CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING=y
> CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT=y
> CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG=y
>
> If vmalloc_test_init() run before alloc_tag_init(), memory
> failure tests would invoke alloc_tag_top_users() which is not
> ready to use and cause kernel BUG:
>
> [ 135.116045] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030
> [ 135.116063] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 135.116074] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [ 135.116085] PGD 0 P4D 0
> [ 135.116094] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
> [ 135.116123] Tainted: [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
> [ 135.116132] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
> [ 135.116148] RIP: 0010:down_read_trylock+0x1d/0x80
> [ 135.116188] RSP: 0000:ffffb5e481a9b8f8 EFLAGS: 00010246
> [ 135.116200] RAX: ffff93dc8a5ac700 RBX: 0000000000000030 RCX: 8000000000000007
> [ 135.116214] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 000000000000000a RDI: ffffffff93d2e733
> [ 135.116228] RBP: ffffb5e481a9b9a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000003
> [ 135.116241] R10: ffffb5e481a9b860 R11: ffffffff94ec6328 R12: ffffb5e481a9b9b0
> [ 135.116255] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffffffff94e0c580
> [ 135.116271] FS: 00007fd41947e540(0000) GS:ffff93dd6654a000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 135.116286] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 135.116298] CR2: 0000000000000030 CR3: 00000001099f8000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
> [ 135.116314] Call Trace:
> [ 135.116321] <TASK>
> [ 135.116328] codetag_trylock_module_list+0x9/0x20
> [ 135.116342] alloc_tag_top_users+0x153/0x1b0
> [ 135.116354] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
> [ 135.116365] ? _printk+0x57/0x80
> [ 135.116378] __show_mem+0xeb/0x210
> [ 135.116394] ? dump_header+0x2ce/0x3e0
> [ 135.116405] dump_header+0x2ce/0x3e0
>
> Demote vmalloc_test_init to late_initcall can make sure alloc_tag
> module got initialized before test_vmalloc module.
I'm not sure this is the right place to fix it.
The bug can be triggered by any early memory allocation failure,
before alloc_tag_init() is called (yeah, that's not that likely).
There is nothing specific to vmalloc that triggers the bug.
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
> Link: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250620100258.595495-1-00107082@163.com/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!NXhzLP0lE5O2YKK9PfCt3LDTk4qWGsy1ebNXBQETNNJrL2JS3R01iunwBVXbDA4_kKjrbyQWfzNa7iN5RQ$
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> Closes: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202506181351.bba867dd-lkp@intel.com__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!NXhzLP0lE5O2YKK9PfCt3LDTk4qWGsy1ebNXBQETNNJrL2JS3R01iunwBVXbDA4_kKjrbyQWfzP95R5wqA$
> Fixes: 2d76e79315e4 ("lib/test_vmalloc.c: allow built-in execution")
> Signed-off-by: David Wang <00107082@....com>
> ---
> lib/test_vmalloc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_vmalloc.c b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
> index 1b0b59549aaf..5af009df56ad 100644
> --- a/lib/test_vmalloc.c
> +++ b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
> @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ static int __init vmalloc_test_init(void)
> return IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC) ? 0:-EAGAIN;
> }
>
> -module_init(vmalloc_test_init)
> +late_initcall(vmalloc_test_init)
>
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Uladzislau Rezki");
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists