[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGOSIB_H70IAWH3g@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 10:45:36 +0300
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>, Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>,
"Tauro, Riana" <riana.tauro@...el.com>,
"Adatrao, Srinivasa" <srinivasa.adatrao@...el.com>,
"Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>,
intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] i2c: designware: Add quirk for Intel Xe
On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 08:28:12PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Heikki,
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 04:53:11PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > The regmap is coming from the parent also in case of Xe
> > GPUs. Reusing the Wangxun quirk for that.
>
> What I don't like, though, is that there is no mention of the
> change in the probe in the commit log.
>
> Besides, are these changes related? Can we have them split in two
> different patches? I guess this would also make Andy's point
> about the extra churn.
I think you are right about splitting the patch. I'll do just that.
Thanks for the review Andi.
--
heikki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists