[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aJov4RkRMRhCB1DU@eldamar.lan>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 20:01:05 +0200
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
To: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>, Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Ben Hutchings <benh@...ian.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binder: Add missing module description
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 05:36:20PM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2025 at 09:30:18AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > During build modpost issues a warning:
> >
> > # MODPOST Module.symvers
> > ./scripts/mod/modpost -M -m -b -o Module.symvers -n -T modules.order vmlinux.o
> > WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/android/binder_linux.o
> >
> > Fix this by adding the missing module description.
>
> I'm not against having a description but binder is not tristate. Judging
> from the 'binder_linux.o' this seems to be some OOT version? Otherwise,
> I'm not sure you would be able to reproduce the warn.
This is entirely my fault. We saw the warning while building in
Debian, but missed that we apply the following patch:
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/patches/debian/android-enable-building-binder-as-module.patch?ref_type=heads
which allows to build binder as module.
I got confused by the fact that we have
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
in the upstream variant, but no description.
So you want to still have the description added or drop this proposed
patch completely instead?
Regards,
Salvatore
Powered by blists - more mailing lists