[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250811070214.GT476609@black.igk.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:02:14 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>,
"Rangoju, Raju" <raju.rangoju@....com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
andreas.noever@...il.com, michael.jamet@...el.com,
westeri@...nel.org, YehezkelShB@...il.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
Sanath.S@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] thunderbolt: Update XDomain vendor properties
dynamically
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 07:28:21AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 06:53:07AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 04:13:28PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > 0004 USB4
> > > >
> > > > sounds good to me. In USB4 there is no "root hub". It's called host router
> > > > (but we do have device routers that are called USB4 hubs for added
> > > > confusion ;-).
> > > >
> > > > But I'm fine with other numbers too, does not matter if you want to save it
> > > > for some future USB variant.
> > >
> > > Ok, use 0004 for this. But what should I use for the text string here
> > > in the usb.ids file?
> >
> > Thanks! I'll cook up a patch changing these.
> >
> > I don't think it should be in usb.ids because it is not visible anywhere
> > except over USB4 link (between hosts). You don't see this through USB 2.x
> > or 3.x.
>
> It goes in usb.ids as that is what I use to keep track of all of the
> assigned product ids for this vendor :)
Right, got it.
> So, should I use "USB 4.0 host link" or something else?
USB4 Connection Manager
Powered by blists - more mailing lists