linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add interconnect support for Glymur SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7806e54a-4355-4173-91f7-8da98cbfeef2@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 15:52:09 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Raviteja Laggyshetty <raviteja.laggyshetty@....qualcomm.com>,
 Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Mike Tipton <mike.tipton@....qualcomm.com>,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Odelu Kukatla <odelu.kukatla@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add interconnect support for Glymur SoC

On 14/08/2025 16:54, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote:
> Add interconnect dt-bindings and driver support for
> Qualcomm's next gen compute SoC - Glymur.
> Device tree changes aren't part of this series and will be posted
> separately after the official announcement of the Glymur SoC.


No dependencies explained, so how maintainers can understand that they
CANNOT apply this patch? :/

Nice example of throwing the code over the wall, does not matter it does
not even pass standard checks...

Best regards,
Krzysztof