lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09247b50-05c4-40ff-9d9e-51e36846996d@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 18:03:07 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Raviteja Laggyshetty <raviteja.laggyshetty@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Mike Tipton <mike.tipton@....qualcomm.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Odelu Kukatla <odelu.kukatla@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: interconnect: document the RPMh
 Network-On-Chip interconnect in Glymur SoC

On 19/08/2025 15:46, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> On 8/19/25 4:31 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 9:54 AM Raviteja Laggyshetty
>> <raviteja.laggyshetty@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Document the RPMh Network-On-Chip Interconnect in Glymur platform.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Odelu Kukatla <odelu.kukatla@....qualcomm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Odelu Kukatla <odelu.kukatla@....qualcomm.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <raviteja.laggyshetty@....qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,glymur-rpmh.yaml    | 172 +++++++++++++++++
>>>   .../dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,glymur-rpmh.h    | 205 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   2 files changed, 377 insertions(+)
>>
>> This is breaking linux-next "make dt_binding_check". Looks like the
>> clock header dependency in the example is not applied. Please drop
>> this until the dependency is there.
> 
> Thanks! And now i see why my script didn't catch this... now fixed and
> patch dropped.


What are you using to apply patches? Because b4 would pull all
dependencies, which would brake your branch as well, but at least you
would see something odd happening here.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ