[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKPOu+_wQ9DDHOQDtFeXU7ZqwvwxYqXNqWeSP3zJpfC0Cm2YAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 11:26:48 +0200
From: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Kiryl Shutsemau <kirill@...temov.name>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
axelrasmussen@...gle.com, yuanchu@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org,
hughd@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org, surenb@...gle.com, vishal.moola@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] mm/shmem: add `const` to lots of pointer parameters
On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 10:35 AM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
> We usually write complete sentences, and there is nothing wrong with
> repeating what the subject says.
>
> All the time it takes you to argue here would be better used improving
> your patch descriptions.
Sure, but first I need to know what is really needed. Reviews on LKML
are often contradictory, and it's easy to get pushed around from one
corner to the next.
I just posted v4 with longer commit messages. I think that's a lot of
unnecessary noise that takes a lot of time to read, but oh well, if
that's what you guys really want...
(In the days of LLMs, writing is almost free, but reading all that
redundant or generated garbage text becomes impossible. I think it is
harmful to have so much redundant text because time spent reading it
is time wasted. But that's just my opinion.)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists