linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SDM660 LPASS LPI TLMM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aLixvcgoRIHoniv-@radian>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 17:23:09 -0400
From: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@...il.com>
To: Nickolay Goppen <setotau@...nlining.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
	linux@...nlining.org, Nickolay Goppen <setotau@...dex.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SDM660 LPASS LPI TLMM

On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 04:39:03PM +0300, Nickolay Goppen wrote:
> From: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@...il.com>
> 
> The Snapdragon 660 has a Low-Power Island (LPI) TLMM for configuring
> pins related to audio. Add the driver for this.
> Also, this driver uses predefined pin_offsets for each pin taken from
> downstream driver, which does not follow the usual 0x1000 distance
> between pins and uses an array with predefined offsets that do not
> follow any regular pattern [1].
> 
> [1] https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/msm-4.4/-/blob/LA.UM.7.2.c27-07400-sdm660.0/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpi.c#L107
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@...il.com>
> Co-developed-by: Nickolay Goppen <setotau@...nlining.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nickolay Goppen <setotau@...nlining.org>
> ---

(snip)

> +const struct lpi_pingroup sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_groups[] = {
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(0, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x0000),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(1, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x1000),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(2, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x2000),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(3, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x2010),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(4, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x3000),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(5, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x3010),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(6, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x4000),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(7, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x4010),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(8, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x5000),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(9, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x5010),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(10, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x5020),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(11, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x5030),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(12, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x6000),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(13, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x6010),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(14, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x7000),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(15, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x7010),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(16, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x5040),
> +	LPI_PINGROUP_OFFSET(17, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _, 0x5050),
> +
> +	/* The function names of the PDM GPIOs are derived from SDM670 */

Not anymore, the names now match the other LPI drivers closer.
This can be removed.