linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] sched: make migrate_enable/migrate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQLCJETYQuqeQQYnDMKvM14BnvUDSE4mi5Z_UHdhewv2FA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 09:27:07 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Menglong Dong <menglong.dong@...ux.dev>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, 
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, 
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, 
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, 
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, 
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Eduard <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, 
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, 
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, 
	tzimmermann@...e.de, simona.vetter@...ll.ch, 
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] sched: make migrate_enable/migrate_disable inline

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 4:07 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 02:03:53PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote:
>
> > +/* The "struct rq" is not available here, so we can't access the
> > + * "runqueues" with this_cpu_ptr(), as the compilation will fail in
> > + * this_cpu_ptr() -> raw_cpu_ptr() -> __verify_pcpu_ptr():
> > + *   typeof((ptr) + 0)
> > + *
> > + * So use arch_raw_cpu_ptr()/PERCPU_PTR() directly here.
> > + */
>
> Please fix broken comment style while you fix that compile error.

+1

We switched to normal kernel comment style in bpf land quite some
time ago, but old habits die hard and I have to keep reminding people
to use normal comments in all new code.