[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3549625.aeNJFYEL58@senjougahara>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 11:44:42 +0900
From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>, Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] ARM: tegra114: add missing HOST1X device nodes
On Wednesday, August 27, 2025 8:37 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> Add nodes for devices on the HOST1X bus: VI, EPP, ISP, MSENC and TSEC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra114.dtsi | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra114.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra114.dtsi
> index 4caf2073c556..8600a5c52be9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra114.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra114.dtsi
> @@ -47,6 +47,45 @@ host1x@...00000 {
>
> ranges = <0x54000000 0x54000000 0x01000000>;
>
> + vi@...80000 {
> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-vi";
> + reg = <0x54080000 0x00040000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 69 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_VI>;
> + resets = <&tegra_car 20>;
> + reset-names = "vi";
You are adding reset-names here, but in the last patch you're removing it where there's only one reset?
> +
> + iommus = <&mc TEGRA_SWGROUP_VI>;
> +
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + epp@...c0000 {
> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-epp";
> + reg = <0x540c0000 0x00040000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 70 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_EPP>;
> + resets = <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_EPP>;
> + reset-names = "epp";
> +
> + iommus = <&mc TEGRA_SWGROUP_EPP>;
> +
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + isp@...00000 {
> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-isp";
> + reg = <0x54100000 0x00040000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 71 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_ISP>;
> + resets = <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_ISP>;
> + reset-names = "isp";
> +
> + iommus = <&mc TEGRA_SWGROUP_ISP>;
> +
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> gr2d@...40000 {
> compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-gr2d";
> reg = <0x54140000 0x00040000>;
> @@ -149,6 +188,31 @@ dsib: dsi@...00000 {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> };
> +
> + msenc@...c0000 {
> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-msenc";
> + reg = <0x544c0000 0x00040000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 68 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_MSENC>;
> + resets = <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_MSENC>;
> + reset-names = "mpe";
FWIW, I think 'msenc' is the appropriate name to use on Tegra114/Tegra124. I believe MPE is a remnant from older chips, even if some downstream (and I guess upstreaming) naming still uses it.
> +
> + iommus = <&mc TEGRA_SWGROUP_MSENC>;
> +
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + tsec@...00000 {
> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-tsec";
> + reg = <0x54500000 0x00040000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 50 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_TSEC>;
> + resets = <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_TSEC>;
> +
> + iommus = <&mc TEGRA_SWGROUP_TSEC>;
> +
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> };
>
> gic: interrupt-controller@...41000 {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists