[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aM5ZwWiFDOuSl6C5@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 08:37:37 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Kiryl Shutsemau <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/5] mm/fault: Try to map the entire file folio in
finish_fault()
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 01:40:35PM +0100, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
> The finish_fault() function uses per-page fault for file folios. This
> only occurs for file folios smaller than PMD_SIZE.
>
> The comment suggests that this approach prevents RSS inflation.
> However, it only prevents RSS accounting. The folio is still mapped to
> the process, and the fact that it is mapped by a single PTE does not
> affect memory pressure. Additionally, the kernel's ability to map
> large folios as PMD if they are large enough does not support this
> argument.
>
> When possible, map large folios in one shot. This reduces the number of
> minor page faults and allows for TLB coalescing.
>
> Mapping large folios at once will allow the rmap code to mlock it on
> add, as it will recognize that it is fully mapped and mlocking is safe.
Does this patch have any measurable effect? Almost all folios are
mapped through do_fault_around(). I'm not objecting to the patch,
but the commit message maybe makes this sound more important than it is.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists