linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22/24] arm64: dts: qcom: glymur: Add display clock controller device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJKOXPd97tJ_1cRZQmKE_1-B7AqgRr_CJ1cYMe=v4hBb9Z3eog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 17:18:05 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Pankaj Patil <pankaj.patil@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/24] arm64: dts: qcom: glymur: Add display clock
 controller device

On Thu, 25 Sept 2025 at 15:34, Pankaj Patil
<pankaj.patil@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> From: Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>
>
> Support the display clock controller for GLYMUR SoC.

One clock controller is not a separate commit.

Stop inflating patch count, you just makes it difficult for us to see
complete picture.

Is this somehow for LWN stats? That's why one node per patch?

Best regards,
Krzysztof