[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251002003432.GA2714683-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 19:34:32 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom-ipcc: Add bindings for
physical client ids
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 08:34:20PM -0700, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> Physical client IDs instead of virtual client IDs are used for qcom new
> platforms in the Inter Process Communication Controller (IPCC) driver
> as virtual physical mapping logic is removed in HW. Add the bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> include/dt-bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.h | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
This looks incomplete. Where's the binding additions for the new h/w
that uses these ids. This series looks more complete:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250924183726.509202-3-sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com
Can QCom please coordinate your work so we're not getting the same thing
a day apart.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists