[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fdca746b-e1b0-4610-ada1-6d9fd156c7c7@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 14:48:44 +0800
From: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom-ipcc: Add bindings for
physical client ids
On 10/2/2025 8:34 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 08:34:20PM -0700, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>> Physical client IDs instead of virtual client IDs are used for qcom new
>> platforms in the Inter Process Communication Controller (IPCC) driver
>> as virtual physical mapping logic is removed in HW. Add the bindings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> include/dt-bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.h | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
>
> This looks incomplete. Where's the binding additions for the new h/w
> that uses these ids. This series looks more complete:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250924183726.509202-3-sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com
>
> Can QCom please coordinate your work so we're not getting the same thing
> a day apart.
>
> Rob
Hi Rob,
Sorry we thought all the platform use the same phy id at first, as different platform
has different IDs, maybe it is better to maintain it in different header files
like qcom-ipcc-kaanapali.h? Please let me know if you have disagreement for this.
Thanks,
Jingyi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists