linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] mm/khugepaged: fix comment for default scan sleep duration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251015174055.70060-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 10:40:55 -0700
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: wang lian <lianux.mm@...il.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
	Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
	Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
	Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
	Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mm/khugepaged: fix comment for default scan sleep duration

On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 17:29:57 +0800 wang lian <lianux.mm@...il.com> wrote:

> The comment for khugepaged_scan_sleep_millisecs incorrectly states
> the default scan period is 30 seconds. The actual default value in the
> code is 10000ms (10 seconds).
> 
> This patch corrects the comment to match the code, preventing potential
> confusion. The incorrect comment has existed since the feature was
> first introduced.
> 
> Fixes: ba76149f47d8 ("thp: khugepaged")
> 
> Signed-off-by: wang lian <lianux.mm@...il.com>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>

Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>


Thanks,
SJ

[...]