[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f9bbf6c-146e-46e9-9506-e5fd444ae195@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 09:42:43 +0200
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, andrew@...n.ch,
hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
richardcochran@...il.com, vladimir.oltean@....com,
vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev, rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk,
christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr, rosenp@...il.com, steen.hegelund@...rochip.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 1/2] phy: mscc: Use PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL for VSC8584,
VSC8582, VSC8575, VSC856X
Hi Horatiu,
On 17/10/2025 08:48, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> As the PHYs VSC8584, VSC8582, VSC8575 and VSC856X exists only as rev B,
> we can use PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL to match exactly on revision B of the PHY.
> Because of this change then there is not need the check if it is a
> different revision than rev B in the function vsc8584_probe() as we
> already know that this will never happen.
> These changes are a preparation for the next patch because in that patch
> we will make the PHYs VSC8574 and VSC8572 to use vsc8584_probe() and
> these PHYs have multiple revision.
>
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists