[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25ad160b-b618-4ade-a978-e4ae56c79e32@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 03:47:29 +0530
From: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar <abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jie Zhang <quic_jiezh@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs615: Add gpu and rgmu nodes
On 10/22/2025 8:57 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 10/17/25 7:08 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> From: Jie Zhang <quic_jiezh@...cinc.com>
>>
>> Add gpu and rgmu nodes for qcs615 chipset.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jie Zhang <quic_jiezh@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> + gpu_zap_shader: zap-shader {
>> + memory-region = <&pil_gpu_mem>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + gpu_opp_table: opp-table {
>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>> +
>> + opp-845000000 {
>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <845000000>;
>> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_turbo>;
>> + opp-peak-kBps = <7050000>;
>
> Are there speed bins?
None I am aware of as of now.
>
> [...]
>
>> + rgmu: rgmu@...a000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,adreno-rgmu-612.0", "qcom,adreno-rgmu";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x0506a000 0x0 0x34000>;
>> + reg-names = "gmu";
>> +
>> + clocks = <&gpucc GPU_CC_CX_GMU_CLK>,
>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_CXO_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_DDRSS_GPU_AXI_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_GPU_MEMNOC_GFX_CLK>,
>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_HLOS1_VOTE_GPU_SMMU_CLK>;
>> + clock-names = "gmu",
>> + "cxo",
>> + "axi",
>> + "memnoc",
>> + "smmu_vote";
>> +
>> + power-domains = <&gpucc CX_GDSC>,
>> + <&gpucc GX_GDSC>,
>> + <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_CX>;
>> + power-domain-names = "cx", "gx", "vdd_cx";
>
> I think the gpucc node should reference _CX directly instead,
> then genpd/opp should trickle the requirements up the chain
Do you mean the CX rail scaling here should be handled by gpucc clk driver?
>
>> +
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 304 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> + <GIC_SPI 305 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + interrupt-names = "oob", "gmu";
>
> 1 a line, please
Ack. Thanks
-Akhil
>
> lgtm otherwise
>
> Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists