[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251104-unified-velcro-01219faf6dbd@wendy>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 08:59:03 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Prajna Rajendra Kumar <prajna.rajendrakumar@...rochip.com>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof
Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
Valentina Fernandez Alanis <valentina.fernandezalanis@...rochip.com>, "Cyril
Jean" <cyril.jean@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] spi: add support for microchip "soft" spi
controller
On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 04:05:15PM +0000, Prajna Rajendra Kumar wrote:
> Introduce driver support for the Microchip FPGA CoreSPI IP.
>
> This driver supports only the Motorola SPI mode. TI and NSC modes are
> not currently supported.
When you send v2, it's probably worth mentioning all of the other
restrictions the driver current has, that are being enforced in probe.
> +static struct platform_driver mchp_corespi_driver = {
> + .probe = mchp_corespi_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "microchip-corespi",
> + .pm = MICROCHIP_SPI_PM_OPS,
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(mchp_corespi_dt_ids),
> + },
> + .remove_new = mchp_corespi_remove,
As the lkp bot pointed out, this doesn't exist in the tree any more,
probably since 6.13 or so. Please test patches you're sending upstream
against upstream.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists