[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKmqyKOBr2eV6AeWH6SHz_UX4ciKgdf3zGJ9LMHEOuFz55kO+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 22:22:13 +1000
From: Alistair Francis <alistair23@...il.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: kbusch@...nel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, hch@....de, sagi@...mberg.me,
kch@...dia.com, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] nvme: Expose the tls_configured sysfs for secure
concat connections
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 5:21 PM Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On 11/13/25 03:08, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 5:08 PM Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/12/25 00:45, alistair23@...il.com wrote:
> >>> From: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>
> >>> ---
> >>> v2:
> >>> - New patch
> >>>
> >>> drivers/nvme/host/sysfs.c | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/sysfs.c b/drivers/nvme/host/sysfs.c
> >>> index 29430949ce2f..6d10e12136d0 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/sysfs.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/sysfs.c
> >>> @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static umode_t nvme_tls_attrs_are_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> >>> !ctrl->opts->tls && !ctrl->opts->concat)
> >>> return 0;
> >>> if (a == &dev_attr_tls_configured_key.attr &&
> >>> - (!ctrl->opts->tls_key || ctrl->opts->concat))
> >>> + !ctrl->opts->concat)
> >>> return 0;
> >>> if (a == &dev_attr_tls_keyring.attr &&
> >>> !ctrl->opts->keyring)
> >>
> >> ??
> >>
> >> How can you have a configured TLS Key for secure concatenation?
> >
> > I'm not sure I follow
> >
> > `ctrl->opts->tls_key` is directly set at the end of the
> > `nvme_auth_secure_concat()` function, so it will be set for secure
> > concatenation.
> >
> Right, sorry. Of course you are right.
>
> But I'm still a bit unsure about the interface here; just writing
> anything into it doesn't feel like the correct way of doing it.
I'm happy to change that.
I was thinking a bool, so basically write 1 to trigger
>
> I would rather modify the interface to allow a key serial number (or 0).
> That would allow us to modify the configured key, which currently is
> fixed for the lifetime of the connection.
Wouldn't a configured key (`tls_key`) be changed via the tlshd
interface, not writing a key serial to sysfs?
> And writing '0' would reset the configured key, reverting to automatic
> key selection.
> Having such an interface would actually be beneficial, as it would
> remove some limitations from the current interface.
Anyway, I'm not sure your vision conflicts with allowing "write 1 to
`tls_configured_key` to trigger a REPLACETLSPSK"
Alistair
>
> Hmm?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hannes
> --
> Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
> hare@...e.de +49 911 74053 688
> SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
> HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists