lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251117193750.GAaRt5jpu9XSHEawSM@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 20:37:50 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip] x86/microcode/AMD: Read from MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL
 to get base_rev if not defined

On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 02:15:27PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> AMD microcode is being handled inconsistenly depending on whether the
> CONFIG_MICROCODE_DBG is on or off.

Did you read the help text to CONFIG_MICROCODE_DBG?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ