linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: qcom: rpmh: Add support for Kaanapali rpmh clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <05a2580a-260b-4cb8-8970-4ec46ee8da7e@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 23:57:10 +0530
From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
        Taniya Das
	<taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette
	<mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Ajit Pandey
	<ajit.pandey@....qualcomm.com>,
        Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@....qualcomm.com>,
        Jagadeesh Kona <jagadeesh.kona@....qualcomm.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: qcom: rpmh: Add support for Kaanapali rpmh
 clocks



On 11/25/2025 11:55 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 11:45:23PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/22/2025 3:30 PM, Taniya Das wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/22/2025 2:10 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 11:26:27PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>>>> Add the RPMH clocks present in Kaanapali SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
>>>>> index 1a98b3a0c528c24b600326e6b951b2edb6dcadd7..c3d923a829f16f5a73ea148aca231a0d61d3396d 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
>>>>> @@ -395,6 +395,18 @@ DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(clk4, _a, "C4A_E0", 1);
>>>>>  DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(clk5, _a, "C5A_E0", 1);
>>>>>  DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(clk8, _a, "C8A_E0", 1);
>>>>>  
>>>>> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(clk1, _a1_e0, "C1A_E0", 1);
>>>>> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(clk2, _a1_e0, "C2A_E0", 1);
>>>>
>>>> This got better, but not enough. Why do we have now clk[12]_a1_e0, but
>>>> clk[3458]_a, describing the same kind of resources?
>>>
>>> I am going to fix those as Dmitry.
>>>
>>
>> Dmitry, I have fixed this on Glymur to ensure to use "div" and "e0"
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251125-glymur_rpmhcc_fix-v1-1-60081b3cce7f@oss.qualcomm.com/T/#u
> 
> The patch should have been a part of this series. It makes little sense
> on its own.
> 

Sure, Dmitry I will add it as part of this series in the next patchset.

>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(clk3, _a2_e0, "C3A_E0", 2);
>>>>> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(clk4, _a2_e0, "C4A_E0", 2);
>>>>> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(clk5, _a2_e0, "C5A_E0", 2);
>>>>> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(clk6, _a2_e0, "C6A_E0", 2);
>>>>> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(clk7, _a2_e0, "C7A_E0", 2);
>>>>> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(clk8, _a2_e0, "C8A_E0", 2);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_VRM(clk11, _a4_e0, "C11A_E0", 4);
>>>>> +
>>>>>  DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(ce, "CE0");
>>>>>  DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(hwkm, "HK0");
>>>>>  DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_BCM(ipa, "IP0");
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Thanks,
>> Taniya Das
>>
>