[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251128130400.bimjex7ptnbsokul@DEN-DL-M31836.microchip.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 14:04:00 +0100
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
<Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com>, <romain.sioen@...rochip.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: dts: Add support for pcb8385
The 11/28/2025 10:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On 27/11/2025 10:24, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > The 11/26/2025 11:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> >>> +
> >>> +&flx0 {
> >>> + atmel,flexcom-mode = <ATMEL_FLEXCOM_MODE_TWI>;
> >>> + status = "okay";
> >>> +
> >>> + i2c0: i2c@600 {
> >>
> >> You added a label, so this feels like a new node, but then you miss
> >> compatible and status feels redundant.
> >
> > Ah.. OK. I didn't want to add a new node.
> >
> >>
> >> If this is override, you should rather override by labels/phandles in
> >> the first place. Even when overriding by full node path, you should not
> >> add custom labels - they belong to the base SoC.
> >
> > I can remove the label.
> > So, when I want to override or extend with new properties I should
> > labels?
>
>
> Yes, child of serial engine should still be extended by label/phandle,
> unless this SoC subsystem has different rule.
What do you mean by "child of serial engine"?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
--
/Horatiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists