linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: add IPQ9574 image loader

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251219144433.GA3163791-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 08:44:33 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: add IPQ9574 image
 loader

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 10:34:10PM -0600, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> Document the IPQ9574 native (non-PAS) WCSS image loader. It is similar
> to IPQ8074 WCSS, but requires several new clocks. These clocks must be
> enabled by the host in non-PAS mode, and are not optional. Add an
> example that uses the "qcom,ipq9574-wcss-pil" binding.

Is the new example really much different and unique. If not, drop it 
(especially since it wasn't even tested).

Rob