lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMgjq7C3XxHNALturkgpzne6VYTSmsyBMTTG68MMQJaQt=1j6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 01:26:56 +0800
From: Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>, 
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>, David Hildenbrand <david@...nel.org>, 
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Youngjun Park <youngjun.park@....com>, 
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, 
	Ying Huang <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>, 
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, 
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/19] mm, swap: split locked entry duplicating into a
 standalone helper

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 2:37 AM Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 7:22 PM Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/05/25 at 03:29am, Kairui Song wrote:
> > > From: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
> > >
> > > No feature change, split the common logic into a stand alone helper to
> >                                                    ~~~~~~~~~~~
> >                                                     standalone, typo?
> > > be reused later.
> >
> > In phase 2, I saw the newly added swap_dup_entries() is only called by
> > __swap_duplicate(). The 'reused later' means?
> >
>
> Ah you are right, this patch belongs to phase 3 I think, I can drop it
> for now, it's just a code rearrangement. Thanks!

Hi Baoquan

While working on V5 I noticed we do need this patch, the patch "mm,
swap: use swap cache as the swap in synchronize layer" needs this
splitted helper as an intermediate step. That usage will be dropped by
the end of this series but I think we can live with this splitted out
helper. The splitted helper and original help will all be gone in
phase 3, and there is no behavior change at all.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ