[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251221111047.597248db9868d278c7786f6b@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 11:10:47 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Wangyang Guo <wangyang.guo@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tianyou Li <tianyou.li@...el.com>, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Liang <dan.liang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/group_cpus: make group CPU cluster aware
On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 10:30:38 +0800 Wangyang Guo <wangyang.guo@...el.com> wrote:
> As CPU core counts increase, the number of NVMe IRQs may be smaller than
> the total number of CPUs. This forces multiple CPUs to share the same
> IRQ. If the IRQ affinity and the CPU’s cluster do not align, a
> performance penalty can be observed on some platforms.
It would be helpful to quantify "performance penalty". At least give
readers some approximate understanding of how serious this issue is,
please.
> This patch improves IRQ affinity by grouping CPUs by cluster within each
> NUMA domain, ensuring better locality between CPUs and their assigned
> NVMe IRQs.
>
> Reviewed-by: Tianyou Li <tianyou.li@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> Tested-by: Dan Liang <dan.liang@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wangyang Guo <wangyang.guo@...el.com>
Patch hasn't attracted additional review so I'll queue this version for
some testing in mm.git's mm-nonmm-unstable branch. I'll add a
note-to-self that a changelog addition is desirable.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists